- Question on B.C. Referendum on Treaty Negotiations

October 26, 2004


April 8, 2002

    Mr. Pat Martin (Winnipeg Centre, NDP): Mr. Speaker, well meaning British Columbians are struggling over how to deal with the referendum that arrived in their mailbox on treaty negotiations and first nations' land claims. Not only are the eight questions poorly crafted and difficult to understand, they seem deliberately designed to bind the government to positions that first nations can never accept and thus jeopardizing all future land claims negotiations.

    Will the minister of Indian affairs agree that putting minority rights to a majority vote is offensive, divisive and inflammatory? Will he tell Canadians that he too disagrees fundamentally with holding this B.C. referendum on sensitive land claims negotiations?

    Hon. Robert Nault (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, the position of the Government of Canada and for the good of the economy and the people of British Columbia is to get into a tripartite negotiation with the first nation communities in order to build modern treaties, to bring certainty to land tenure which would allow, for example, in the last number of studies that we have done an increase in economic development of some billion dollars a year.

It has also been our position that we do not think referendums are helpful. We prefer to get to the table and negotiate.


Reply
Comment Style: Order:



Powered by Back-End. Copyleft software licensed under the GPL. Built by OpenConcept
[ Login  Home  Search  Polls  Signup  Signatures  Link  Gallery  Site Map  ]
home